The Three big ideas for tech regulation

UU cooperation. Senator Mark Warner says tech giants like Facebook, Google and Twitter have improved a bit in recent years, but there is a possibility that the Snowball in Hell will continue to organize itself.

Warner said in an episode of Recode Decode with Kara Swisher: “There were no companies of this magnitude before and this force did not have any level of supervision.” “The old roof [of the organization] will become the new floor.”

On the podcast, Warner, the Virginia Democrat and American Senator, told Swisher that there was a bipartisan agreement in Congress over the need for new legislation on digital privacy, although he believed it was “necessary but not sufficient.” A national privacy bill proposed three great ideas he said would address deficiencies in Silicon Valley.

You can read the specific quotes from those suggestions below, as well as listen to the full interview on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, and TuneIn, or wherever you get your audio files.

Dark patterns and data collection.

“There is nothing free here,” said Warner. “They say Facebook and Google are free. They are free.”

In many ways, he explained, companies are completely less honest than their users. One is the way consumers expect to “accept” legal terms of service and unwanted marketing emails because they believe they have no other choice.

say yes or you cannot say no,” he said. Warner. You say “Learn more” or you can never find the “unsubscribe” button.

The proposed treatment is a two-tier standard for market transparency about what we agree on and where our data go.

However, it has not endorsed a system whereby consumers are automatically compensated for the privacy portions of advertising-based companies. Instead, Warner said, a more transparent industry would encourage new participants to think of privacy as an added value and a way to compete with established market leaders.

Interoperability and data interoperability.

Before he was in politics, Warner was an entrepreneur, venture capital, and co-founder of Nextel wireless operator, who merged with Sprint in 2005. He compared the current state of walled gardens to social networks with the inconvenience of being a phone operator. Before communication. Law 1996.

If you are tired of Facebook, we transfer all our data, including your videos, to a new website easily. But if you are going to get data transfer capability, you must also have interoperability even You can talk to people on the previous site. ”

In other words, you can only contact a family member on Facebook without having to be on Facebook yourself, in the same way that you can send an email to someone who has a Yahoo email address even if you prefer Gmail.

Traffic transparency and anonymity

A small but growing group of voices in the world of politics has begun to wonder whether Congress should repeal or revise Article 230 of the Communications Decency Act 1996, a provision that gives extensive protection to technological platforms that are responsible for content published by its users. Warner did not rule that out, but suggested that it might not be necessary if the platforms made 100 percent clear if he was talking to a real person, robot or someone who could not verify his identity or not.

Because if we were trying to think, “How can we at least slow or make people think a little?” “… You know who that is.”

However, I do acknowledge that identity verification rules may need to be different on the outside.

“I realize, as some listeners might say,” verification of identity in the United States. UU. So if you have to have your own hate speech, you can think twice, “It might make sense,” Warner said.

The Three big ideas for tech regulation

Post navigation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *